Anti-GMO labeling law passes House vote

After 275.
On Thursday, the two-party bill will be voted 150 in the Senate.
The Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act, if it becomes law, will create a voluntary genetically modified organism
The free certification program, supervised by the US Department of Agriculture, and overturned genetically modified labeling laws in any state and place.
Legislation prioritizes restrictions and labeling requirements on genetically modified organisms, foods containing genetically modified organisms, and any state and place where non-GMO organisms are present
Genetically modified food and \"natural\" food.
The FDA will review the product before it goes public and only require labeling if it finds \"material differences between foods from genetically engineered plants and similar foods.
However, under a new voluntary certification program, these companies will be allowed to mark their products as genetically modified organisms.
The measure is a setback for advocates and voters who lobby that GMO labeling laws have passed but have not yet entered into force in Vermont, Connecticut and Maine.
At least 15 other states have introduced similar regulations on foods containing genetically modified organisms.
Read more: industry associations still looking for a ban on genetically modified organisms in Vermont
Label the representative for the sponsor of the bill. Mike Pompeo (R-
Kansas) was \"very happy\" with the vote and said \"it is committed to revoking state GMO labeling laws, which could eventually create confusing standards for GMO labeling across the United States.
All proposed amendments have been rejected, one of which is intended to prohibit the use of the word \"nature\" in foods containing genetically modified organisms.
Another rejected amendment calls for if the company or its subsidiaries label the same product in a foreign market with genetically modified organisms. Rep. Jared Polis (D-
Colorado) even suggested changing the name of the bill to \"deprive Americans of the right to know the dark Bill\", but the procedural amendment was rejected.
Vote in the house for a controversial debate on genetically modified organisms in the US food supply.
Members of Congress against the bill protest against the bill.
Salmon \"Frankfurt fish\" processed with eel\"
Like the mouth in the ocean, the cream on the tomatoes
Genes resistant to halibut.
\"They told us, \'Don\'t worry, they won\'t go out, and most of them are sterile.
\"Yes, yes . \"
Peter DeFazio
Oregon), referring to salmon.
According to the Kansas City Star newspaper, eel hybrids.
\"What happens when some of them leave,\" and there are concerns that the bill violates the rights of the states.
\"This legislation essentially takes away your country and I have the ability to do what they think is in the interests of consumers and let them know what they are buying,\" the representative said . \".
Peter Welch (D-Vermont).
Read more: FDA approves genetically modified apples, and for the eatA national agricultural interests alliance, potatoes that are not treated as safe by bruises or Brown support the bill, and said in a letter to lawmakers this spring that genetically modified organisms have become American food for 20 years.
About 90% of corn, soybeans and cotton grown in the United States are genetically modified, and these crops are artificially changed, usually to reduce water or resist pesticides.
\"The act authorizes and directs companies that want to mark their products as genetically modified organisms and conduct marketing --
Through the US Department of Agriculture to do so free of charge
Wade Cowen, president of the American Soybean Association, praised the passage of the bill.
\"ASA believes that this approach will mark a subset of selected products sold at a premium, which makes more sense than marking the vast majority of ordinary day-to-day products at grocery stores.